Importance

October 23, 2003

Swarthmore Crackdown on Protesting Students Reaches New Low

According to the Why War? website, Swarthmore's crackdown on students engaging in Electronic Civil Disobedience has reached a new low (Targeting Diebold with Electronic Civil Disobedience). Now, Swarthmore is allegedly terminating the internet connection of any student who links to the Why War? website, which links to sites hosting the Diebold internal company memos. They are not only terminating the accounts of students who host the files, or the accounts of students who link to the files, but terminating the accounts of students who link to a political protest site that links to the files.

If the allegations are true, this is a tremendous violation of freedom of expression and academic freedom. Swarthmore should be deeply, deeply ashamed.


Previous stories:

Swarthmore Actively Opposes E-Civil Disobedience Campaign
(Electronic) Civil Disobedience at Swarthmore

UPDATE 1745 PT

EFF responds to one of Diebold's notice-and-takedown letters (Re: Diebold’s Copyright Infringement Claim). via Copyfight

UPDATE 2 1840 PT

It Gets Weirder

I have spoken with the student whose website was shutdown. According to the student, his website was redirecting to the Why War? website before it was taken offline. After it was taken offline, he was informed by a member of the Swarthmore IT department that it was the new policy of Swarthmore that students were no longer permitted to link to the Why War? website using HTML anchor tags. However, they could point to the Why War? with plain text, as so: http://www.why-war.com/

See the current page of the student here.

UPDATE 3 1900 PT

I have spoken with a member of Swartmore's IT department and can confirm that two student pages have been shutdown for linking to a page on Why War?'s website that linked to the Diebold files. Swarthmore is currently re-evaluating its linking policy, but until they are satisfied that they cannot be held liable, students are asked to only post plain text that points to the Why War? website.

Posted by Ernest at 4:39 PM
  Comments and Trackbacks (http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/860)

So you can't link to a site that links to a site that hosts the memos. This begs the question, can you link to a site that links to a site that links to a site that hosts the memos? Why or why not?

Posted by Cypherpunk on October 23, 2003 08:33 PM | Permalink to Comment
Swarthmore Bans Indirect Links

Excerpt: Ernest Miller reports that Swarthmore now is now yanking the Net connections of students who linking to a page that links to a page containing the infamous Diebold memos. So Swarthmore students can't make a two-hop link to the memos...

Read the rest...

Trackback from Freedom to Tinker, Oct 24, 2003 7:02 AM
Diebold memos and linking prohibitions at Swarthmore

Excerpt: Look at the linking prohibitions discussions in the DeCSS case for information on the thinking being used.

Read the rest...

Trackback from Infothought, Oct 24, 2003 9:38 AM

Hey, remember kids it is now a capital offence at Swathmore to link to Google, because Google may return a result which contains the Diebold memos or a link to the Diebold memeos.

Posted by JAAC on October 24, 2003 09:40 AM | Permalink to Comment
Conspiracies Abound!

Excerpt: Great stuff today. Why War is waging a campaign to keep some leaked memos available and Diebold is waging one

Read the rest...

Trackback from Greg's Place, Oct 24, 2003 10:30 AM
Disobedience

Excerpt: I haven't written anything about the Diebold electronic voting scandal because Body and Soul has done such a good job, there seemed very little to add. And there are even sites devoted entirely to the topic. One such site, Blackboxvoting.com, became bi...

Read the rest...

Trackback from Keywords, Oct 25, 2003 7:42 AM
My letter to Swarthmore supporting fight against Diebold

Excerpt: They [Diebold] come off like Nixonian thugs trying to suppress their version of the "Pentagon Papers"

Read the rest...

Trackback from Infothought, Oct 25, 2003 7:53 PM
swarthmore's weakness, swarthmore students' strength

Excerpt: So Diebold has hit new lows. After threatening anyone who posts information necessary to evaluate the claimed failure of their vote-counting machine, apparently

Read the rest...

Trackback from Lessig Blog, Oct 27, 2003 4:32 PM
Diebold Wars

Excerpt: In case you haven’t seen it elsewhere, you should check out Targeting Diebold with Electronic Civil Disobedience and the internal memos from Diebold Voting Systems. Swarthmore has been cracking down on students who link to these sites in response t

Read the rest...

Trackback from Adam Kessel, Oct 28, 2003 2:32 PM
apt-get free speech

Excerpt: A poster on Slashdot makes an interesting suggestion about how to conveniently distribute documents when you don’t want anyone to be able to eliminate distribution by taking down a server; and you want to automate distribution of new releases of th

Read the rest...

Trackback from Adam Kessel, Oct 29, 2003 7:26 AM

  Email this entry to a friend
Email this entry to:   
Your email address:   
Message (optional):   
 

  Related Entries