Home > The Importance of...
About this Author
Ernest Miller Ernest Miller pursues research and writing on cyberlaw, intellectual property, and First Amendment issues. Mr. Miller attended the U.S. Naval Academy before attending Yale Law School, where he was president and co-founder of the Law and Technology Society, and founded the technology law and policy news site LawMeme. He is a fellow of the Information Society Project at Yale Law School. Ernest Miller's blog postings can also be found @
Copyfight
LawMeme

Listen to the weekly audio edition on IT Conversations:
The Importance Of ... Law and IT.

Feel free to contact me about articles, websites and etc. you think I may find of interest. I'm also available for consulting work and speaking engagements. Email: ernest.miller 8T gmail.com

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

LINKS
freedom_sake_md_2.PNG Balkinization
bIPlog
bricoleur
Cairns Blog: Beth Noveck
Copyfight
Copyfighter's Musings
Copyright Blog
Chris Cohen
Dan Gillmor's eJournal
DigitalConsumer.org
Displacement of Concepts
DTM :<|
Freedom to Tinker
Furdlog
GigaLaw.com News
GrepLaw
infoAnarchy
Infothought
Internet Law Program Blog
Joe Gratz
Law School Discussion
LawMeme
Lessig Blog
Matt Rolls a Hoover
Napsterization
David Opterbeck
Politech
Scobleizer
SIVACRACY.NET
Slashdot
Susan Crawford Blog
Unlimited Freedom
< A Legally Inclined Weblog >

RECENT ENTRIES
RECENT COMMENTS [xml]
› Jonna Hicks on
Salsa Verde

› Miles Cleveland on
Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 16

› Keagan Sousa on
Kitchen Academy - Course I - Day 14

› Jordan Reichert on
Kitchen Academy - Course I - Day 18

› Keagan Sousa on
Kitchen Academy - Course I - Day 14

› Derek Sullivan on
Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 7

Recent Trackbacks
› jeu casino gratuit:
jeu casino gratuit

› casino en francais:
casino en francais

› Internet and Information Technology Security - eLamb:
To Dan Glickman

› Blogs - Steven Shelton's Blog - GLOAMING.us:
Federal Judges: More Intelligent than Creationists

› The world according to SComps:
Penna going to hell! Robertson confirms it.

› Blog For mis111, Section 1, Group 080:
Coca Cola Threatens Photographer With Lawsuit


Subscribe with Bloglines

Creative Commons License
All text in this web log is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline


The Importance of...


October 27, 2003
LAMP, MIT and Unintended ConsequencesEmail This EntryPrint This Entry
Posted by Ernest Miller

The New York Times (reg. req.) reports on the Library Access to Music Program (LAMP) at MIT (With Cable TV at M.I.T., Who Needs Napster?). You can read MIT's press release (MIT students launch campus-wide electronic music library). Read the FAQ (LAMP Frequently Asked Questions). And you can hardly do an engineering project nowadays without checking with the lawyers, thus, this interim research paper (Engineering an Accessible Music Library: Technical and Legal Challenges [PDF]). Or, if you are so inclined, grab the software (lamp-0.9.tar.gz).

So, what is LAMP? From the FAQ:

LAMP is an electronic music library of 3,500 classical and contemporary CDs that may be accessed across the MIT campus, including in student dormitory rooms and faculty offices. While at MIT, patrons can listen to CDs in the collection instantly and on-demand, free of charge, but nobody can download CDs or save them.

....

Using a Web browser, patrons visit http://lamp.mit.edu/ and "check out" channels of the MIT cable television network for their exclusive use. Patrons browse through LAMP's library of 3,500 CDs and select one to play. The CD plays instantly over the "checked out" cable television channel. Users can pause, rewind, and skip around, just as if they had walked to a real music library and checked out a physical CD. Right now MIT has devoted 16 channels to the project, so 16 users can control playback at a time. An unlimited number of users may listen.

Essentially, LAMP takes advantage of inconsistencies and exemptions in the law of copyright. Because the cable network is analog, public performance of the sound recording does not require permission of the copyright holder. If the transmission were digital, well, let's just say that no one is quite sure who has to be paid how much. A license is still required for the underlying song from the composer or songwriter, but MIT has one (at the bargain price of only $4,000 per year). An additional license was also thought necessary (there are some defenses, but MIT was unwilling to risk liability) in order to have ripped versions of the CDs used in the system. This "ripped" license was approximately $8/CD, and was acquired through Loudeye. Interesting fact, Loudeye didn't have a license until the MIT students alerted the Harry Fox Agency to what Loudeye was up to by asking Harry Fox for a license for ripped CDs the MIT students planned to buy from Loudeye.

Ironically, the most played song on the MIT playlist when I checked was "The Scientist" by Coldplay.

LAMP is a direct result of the seriously confused copyright law regarding music. Exemptions and exceptions have been forced into the law to meet particular business needs and the desires of particular interest groups. The result is a mess that few outside of the legal profession can understand and something only copyright lawyers can love. Although I think that LAMP is great, it is the potentional for just such unintended consequences that makes me fear grafting even more complexity onto existing copyright law.


Category: Copyright | File Sharing


COMMENTS

There are no comments posted yet for this entry.


TRACKBACKS
TrackBack URL: http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-pcorso.cgi/881




POST A COMMENT
Name:

Email:

URL:

Comments:

Remember personal info?



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND
Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES