Feel free to contact me about articles, websites and etc. you think I may find of interest. I'm also available for consulting work and speaking engagements. Email: ernest.miller 8T gmail.com
I've been writing a lot recently about the Real / Apple imbroglio (What Real's Hacking of FairPlay Doesn't Do, Can Copyright Holders Sue Real for Converting Files from Helix DRM to FairPlay DRM?, and Can Real Sue Apple Under the DMCA?). Short story, Real has developed a technology, Harmony, that will convert files encrypted with Real's Helix DRM into files that mimic Apple's FairPlay DRM, but not the reverse. Interesting legal questions are raised.
Today, Apple has issued a press release with a legal threat (Apple Statement):
We are stunned that RealNetworks has adopted the tactics and ethics of a hacker to break into the iPod(R), and we are investigating the implications of their actions under the DMCA and other laws. We strongly caution Real and their customers that when we update our iPod software from time to time it is highly likely that Real's Harmony technology will cease to work with current and future iPods.As if being a hacker is a bad thing. What do you call those two guys who built a computer in their garage and started a little computer company named after a fruit?
Derek Slater has a good selection of links and analysis (Apple Threatens Real). CNN has an article that quotes yours truly (Apple: RealNetworks hacked iPod). Slashdot comments (Apple Not Too Harmonious with Real).
It isn't clear what issues will actually come to the legal forefront. If Real's software was a clear violation of the DMCA, Apple would have said so (and Real probably wouldn't have tried this). There are also various state law possibilities, such as unfair competition and whatnot. This will certainly be a case to watch.
UPDATE 1150 PT
Over on engadget, Siva Vaidhyanathan, copyfighter, has a guest editorial on DRM lock-in that starts with coffee machines and ends up with Apple/Real (The Trouble with Tethering). See also, Derek Slater (The Practical Impact of Lock-in). Concludes Vaidhyanathan,
If Apple is smart (as it occasionally is, but rarely in this domain) it will welcome Rhapsody users. Tethering may be the hot corporate move of the moment. It may be what all the consultants are pushing (corporate consultants are basically anti-competitive). But itís ultimately bad business and - when backed up by law - bad public policy.
Real has also issued a countervailing press release:
RealNetworks Statement about Harmony Technology and Creating Consumer ChoiceUPDATE 2 1205 PT
Real is delighted by initial consumer and music industry support for Harmony. Compatibility, choice and quality are critically important to consumers and Harmony provides all of these to users of the iPod and over 70 other music devices including those from Creative, Rio, iRiver, and others. RealPlayer Music Store provides the highest sound quality of any download music service. That's why so many consumers have welcomed news of Harmony. Consumers, and not Apple, should be the ones choosing what music goes on their iPod.
Harmony follows in a well established tradition of fully legal, independently developed paths to achieve compatibility. There is ample and clear precedent for this activity, for instance the first IBM compatible PCs from Compaq. Harmony creates a way to lock content from Real's music store in a way that is compatible with the iPod, Windows Media DRM devices, and Helix DRM devices. Harmony technology does not remove or disable any digital rights management system. Apple has suggested that new laws such as the DMCA are relevant to this dispute. In fact, the DMCA is not designed to prevent the creation of new methods of locking content and explicitly allows the creation of interoperable software.
We remain fully committed to Harmony and to giving millions of consumers who own portable music devices, including the Apple iPod, choice and compatibility.
Okay, so Apple was mighty ticked off that Real had made Apple's product better, without even getting permission or anything. So Apple cried foul. Apple was shocked 'n' saddened that Real was trying to improve Apple's product, like those hacker guys are always doing. So Apple drew a line in the sand, and swore to make its own product worse again.UPDATE 3 1225 PT
I don't know about you, but I find this all very confusing. I guess I just don't have a head for business.
Tracked on July 29, 2004 06:57 PM"ACMD" (reverse DMCA) in Apple vs. Real Networks from Infothought The DMCA doesn't say anything about *encoders* ... [Read More]
Tracked on July 30, 2004 05:32 AMWill Real's DRM Strategy Succeed? Signs Point to "No" from The Importance of... Cleaning up after last week's coverage of the extensive Apple/Real DRM debate (Apple Gets Real Serious About Harmony), a few more links for the reader's delectation. The Your Tech Weblog has a report from the field that the conversion from... [Read More]
Tracked on August 2, 2004 03:46 PMReal Offering $0.49 Song Downloads from Gear Live: Enter The High Tech Lifestyle Competition is a good thing. Real, for a limited time, is offering songs for half the price of most digital music services. While most offer digital downloads for $0.99 USD per song (or $9.99 USD per album), Real has... [Read More]
Tracked on August 18, 2004 05:48 PMApple vs. Real: The Debate Continues from The Importance of... The repercussions of the Apple/Real conflict continue, and much can be learned from the various commentaries. Previous coverage here: What Real's Hacking of FairPlay Doesn't Do, Apple Gets Real Serious About Harmony and Will Real's DRM Strategy Succeed... [Read More]
Tracked on August 20, 2004 07:33 PM