« 6th Cir. Reaffirms - No De Minimis Defense in Copying Sound Recordings |
Main
| FCC Issues E911 for VoIP Order, Pulver Comments »
June 03, 2005
WikiHow - Thanks, But No Thanks
Posted by Ernest Miller
Wikipedia is one of the great success stories of the internet and will, likely, play an even greater role as it matures. Success, of course, breeds imitation. Recently, I came across a pitch for www.WikiHow.com (no link love for them), which describes itself thus:
wikiHow is a collaborative writing project to build the world's largest how-to manual. With your contributions, we can create a free resource that helps people by offering clear, concise solutions to the problems of everyday life. Please join us by writing a new page, or editing a page that someone else has started.
Yeah, except that, unlike Wikipedia, their Wiki isn't under the
GNU Free Documentation License. In other words, they're basically asking people to slave away for them for free. Thanks, but no thanks.
Extra bonus points for them not mentioning this difference when they note the differences between WikiHow and Wikipedia: "wikiHow differs from Wikipedia in several important respects:"
- Neutral Point of View not Required
- Multiple Methods and Pages
And... I guess the GNU Free Documentation License isn't an important difference. Nice try, guys.
UPDATE 4 July 2005 1415PT
WikiHow has now switched entirely to a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License: WikiHow Responds to Criticism - Goes Creative Commons. Good job guys.
Comments (6)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: News
- RELATED ENTRIES
- Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 23
- Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 22
- Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 21
- Kitchen Academy - The Hollywood Cookbook and Guest Chef Michael Montilla - March 18th
- Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 20
- Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 19
- Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 18
- Salsa Verde
1. joe on June 3, 2005 03:29 PM writes...
No Creative Commons license either? That's too bad.
I can tell you as one with experience as a licensing volunteer with the FSF, there are no larger headaches in licensing discussions than those centered around the GFDL. It's a horrible license and causes tons of pain when things are used in downstream derivatives. So the lack of a license is troubling... not necesssarily the lack of the GFDL.
Permalink to Comment2. Ross Mayfield on June 3, 2005 03:59 PM writes...
I'll blog all about this later, as I have been following eHow's transition to wikiHow, but did you read this?
http://wiki.ehow.com/Copyrights
Permalink to Comment3. Ernest Miller on June 3, 2005 07:02 PM writes...
No, missed that. Doesn't really make a lot of sense however.
Permalink to Comment4. Gary Meany on June 10, 2005 07:38 AM writes...
In other words, they're basically asking people to slave away for them for free.
What? Wikipedia is paying people now?
Permalink to Comment5. Ernest Miller on June 10, 2005 07:47 AM writes...
No, but they aren't the only ones who can make use of the work. The difference between WikiHow and Wikipedia is that WikiHow asks you to give information only for their benefit, essentially, and Wikipedia asks you to give information for the benefit of all. So, yes, Wikipedia asks you to slave away, but not just for them.
Permalink to Comment6. Jack H. on June 11, 2005 07:19 PM writes...
Please don't give up on wikiHow yet. The wikiHow community has been considering adopting a copyleft license for some time now. I am personally optimistic that we will adopt one in the near future. I will return and post more news as things unfold.
Permalink to Comment