« Distinguishing IPTV From Internet TV |
Main
| California's Anti-Violent Videogame Bill Stalls »
June 06, 2005
Blink ›
DRM: Add On or Integral Part?
Writing about the royalties lawsuit involving Tom Wait's music, which I've written about (here and here), Prof. Michael Madison considers the distinction between DRM as add on and DRM as integral part of a product (Downloads and Licenses).
iTunes downloads come with DRM. So, given the accompanying DRM, if were buying the download, what we buy isnt really the equivalent of a CD or vinyl. And its not recording + DRM, either. DRM is integral, rather than a legal or technical add-on. Its designed in. The DRM-limted-iTunes-download is a new and different thing, not the equivalent of a CD but the equivalent of a DRM-limited-use-CD.
I don't see the distinction. Is there some contract involved? If not, why can't I do whatever I want to do with the recording, so long as it doesn't violate copyright law?
posted by Ernest Miller |
|
# |
0 |
0
- RELATED ENTRIES
- Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 23
- Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 22
- Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 21
- Kitchen Academy - The Hollywood Cookbook and Guest Chef Michael Montilla - March 18th
- Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 20
- Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 19
- Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 18
- Salsa Verde
1. Greg H on June 7, 2005 08:41 AM writes...
Respectfully, I think that the professor is quite wrong on this topic. Jon Johansen has proven with his PyMusique/SharpMusique applications that the iTunes DRM is not integral to the songs. The files are downloaded to you computer without DRM. The iTunes application itself wraps the content protection around them after they're delivered to your system, not before.
Permalink to Comment