Corante

About this Author
Ernest Miller Ernest Miller pursues research and writing on cyberlaw, intellectual property, and First Amendment issues. Mr. Miller attended the U.S. Naval Academy before attending Yale Law School, where he was president and co-founder of the Law and Technology Society, and founded the technology law and policy news site LawMeme. He is a fellow of the Information Society Project at Yale Law School. Ernest Miller's blog postings can also be found @
Copyfight
LawMeme

Listen to the weekly audio edition on IT Conversations:
The Importance Of ... Law and IT.

Feel free to contact me about articles, websites and etc. you think I may find of interest. I'm also available for consulting work and speaking engagements. Email: ernest.miller 8T gmail.com

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

The Importance of...

« Rush Limbaugh: Licensing Holding Podcasting Back | Main | Mark Cuban Has Questions About the Macrovision DMCA Lawsuit »

June 15, 2005

Macrovision Invokes DMCA for Analog Copy-Protection Technology

Posted by Ernest Miller

Constitutional Code reports that Macrovision is invoking the Digital Millennium Copyright Act against an analog "signal noise" reducer. This touches on the little-known 17 USC 1201(k), the "Macrovision provision" of the DMCA (Macrovision DMCA Lawsuit Targets DVD Copying Products). This isn't about digital anti-circumvention (the most commonly invoked), but analog anti-circumvention. The following is probably not directly invoked in the case, but will shed some background:

[1201](k) Certain Analog Devices and Certain Technological Measures. -
(1) Certain analog devices. -
(A) Effective 18 months after the date of the enactment of this chapter, no person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide or otherwise traffic in any -
(i) VHS format analog video cassette recorder unless such recorder conforms to the automatic gain control copy control technology;
(ii) 8mm format analog video cassette camcorder unless such camcorder conforms to the automatic gain control technology;
(iii) Beta format analog video cassette recorder, unless such recorder conforms to the automatic gain control copy control technology, except that this requirement shall not apply until there are 1,000 Beta format analog video cassette recorders sold in the United States in any one calendar year after the date of the enactment of this chapter;
(iv) 8mm format analog video cassette recorder that is not an analog video cassette camcorder, unless such recorder conforms to the automatic gain control copy control technology, except that this requirement shall not apply until there are 20,000 such recorders sold in the United States in any one calendar year after the date of the enactment of this chapter; or
(v) analog video cassette recorder that records using an NTSC format video input and that is not otherwise covered under clauses (i) through (iv), unless such device conforms to the automatic gain control copy control technology.
(B) Effective on the date of the enactment of this chapter, no person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide or otherwise traffic in -
(i) any VHS format analog video cassette recorder or any 8mm format analog video cassette recorder if the design of the model of such recorder has been modified after such date of enactment so that a model of recorder that previously conformed to the automatic gain control copy control technology no longer conforms to such technology; or
(ii) any VHS format analog video cassette recorder, or any 8mm format analog video cassette recorder that is not an 8mm analog video cassette camcorder, if the design of the model of such recorder has been modified after such date of enactment so that a model of recorder that previously conformed to the four-line colorstripe copy control technology no longer conforms to such technology. Manufacturers that have not previously manufactured or sold a VHS format analog video cassette recorder, or an 8mm format analog cassette recorder, shall be required to conform to the four-line colorstripe copy control technology in the initial model of any such recorder manufactured after the date of the enactment of this chapter, and thereafter to continue conforming to the four-line colorstripe copy control technology. For purposes of this subparagraph, an analog video cassette recorder ''conforms to'' the four-line colorstripe copy control technology if it records a signal that, when played back by the playback function of that recorder in the normal viewing mode, exhibits, on a reference display device, a display containing distracting visible lines through portions of the viewable picture.
(2) Certain encoding restrictions. - No person shall apply the automatic gain control copy control technology or colorstripe copy control technology to prevent or limit consumer copying except such copying -
(A) of a single transmission, or specified group of transmissions, of live events or of audiovisual works for which a member of the public has exercised choice in selecting the transmissions, including the content of the transmissions or the time of receipt of such transmissions, or both, and as to which such member is charged a separate fee for each such transmission or specified group of transmissions;
(B) from a copy of a transmission of a live event or an audiovisual work if such transmission is provided by a channel or service where payment is made by a member of the public for such channel or service in the form of a subscription fee that entitles the member of the public to receive all of the programming contained in such channel or service;
(C) from a physical medium containing one or more prerecorded audiovisual works; or (D) from a copy of a transmission described in subparagraph (A) or from a copy made from a physical medium described in subparagraph (C). In the event that a transmission meets both the conditions set forth in subparagraph (A) and those set forth in subparagraph (B), the transmission shall be treated as a transmission described in subparagraph (A).
(3) Inapplicability. - This subsection shall not -
(A) require any analog video cassette camcorder to conform to the automatic gain control copy control technology with respect to any video signal received through a camera lens;
(B) apply to the manufacture, importation, offer for sale, provision of, or other trafficking in, any professional analog video cassette recorder; or
(C) apply to the offer for sale or provision of, or other trafficking in, any previously owned analog video cassette recorder, if such recorder was legally manufactured and sold when new and not subsequently modified in violation of paragraph (1)(B).
(4) Definitions. - For purposes of this subsection:
(A) An ''analog video cassette recorder'' means a device that records, or a device that includes a function that records, on electromagnetic tape in an analog format the electronic impulses produced by the video and audio portions of a television program, motion picture, or other form of audiovisual work.
(B) An ''analog video cassette camcorder'' means an analog video cassette recorder that contains a recording function that operates through a camera lens and through a video input that may be connected with a television or other video playback device.
(C) An analog video cassette recorder ''conforms'' to the automatic gain control copy control technology if it -
(i) detects one or more of the elements of such technology and does not record the motion picture or transmission protected by such technology; or
(ii) records a signal that, when played back, exhibits a meaningfully distorted or degraded display.
(D) The term ''professional analog video cassette recorder'' means an analog video cassette recorder that is designed, manufactured, marketed, and intended for use by a person who regularly employs such a device for a lawful business or industrial use, including making, performing, displaying, distributing, or transmitting copies of motion pictures on a commercial scale.
(E) The terms ''VHS format'', ''8mm format'', ''Beta format'', ''automatic gain control copy control technology'', ''colorstripe copy control technology'', ''four-line version of the colorstripe copy control technology'', and ''NTSC'' have the meanings that are commonly understood in the consumer electronics and motion picture industries as of the date of the enactment of this chapter.
(5) Violations. - Any violation of paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be treated as a violation of subsection (b)(1) of this section. Any violation of paragraph (2) of this subsection shall be deemed an ''act of circumvention'' for the purposes of section 1203(c)(3)(A) of this chapter.
Phew! Did you get all that? Most of it doesn't directly apply to this case, but I thought readers might want to look at the extent of format and technology micromanaging that Congress thinks is necessary in copyright law. All this to keep people from copying VHS to VHS (which will soon be dead technology). Don't you love the law? The Home Recording Rights Coalition has some of the legislative history of this provision (Macrovision Legislative History).

This is called the "Macrovision provision" of the DMCA because it essentially mandates use of Macrovision's Analog Copy Protection in VCRs. Wouldn't you love to have your technology mandated by law? Must be nice.

One example of the products under fire is the GoDVD! Model CT-2. Because it is not actually a VCR it doesn't fall under 1201(k), but it would likely run afoul of 1201(b), which makes it illegal to distribute anti-copy protection devices. However, 1201(k) makes it quite clear that Congress considers this technology copy protection technology, and because it is mandated for VCRs, makes arguing around it quite difficult.

Read the Macrovision press release: Macrovision Files Lawsuit Against Sima and Interburn’s DVD Copying Products.

Comments (3) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Digital Millennium Copyright Act


COMMENTS

1. Kevin Marks on June 16, 2005 01:47 AM writes...

Ernest, this was the clause I mentioned yesterday, with it's wholly pernicious distinction between professionals and the rest of us.
The HRRC lists this extract from the report, which sounds like an equal protection violation to me.

Sixth, the exclusion of professional analog video cassette recorders is necessary in order to allow the motion picture, broadcasting, and other legitimate industries and individual businesses to obtain and use equipment that is essential to their normal, lawful business operations. As a further explanation of the types of equipment that are to be subject to this exception, the following factors should be used in evaluating whether a specific product is a "professional'" product:

(1) whether, in the preceding year, only a small number of the devices that are of the same kind, nature, and description were sold to consumers other than professionals employing such devices in a lawful business or industrial use;

(2) whether the device has special features designed for use by professionals employing the device in a lawful business or industrial use;

(3) whether the advertising, promotional and descriptive literature or other materials used to market the device were directed at professionals employing such devices in a lawful business or industrial use;

(4) whether the distribution channels and retail outlets through which the device is distributed and sold are ones used primarily to make sales to professionals employing such devices in a lawful business or industrial use; and

(5) whether the uses to which the device is most commonly put are those associated with the work of professionals employing the device in a lawful business or industrial use.

Permalink to Comment

2. J.N. on June 16, 2005 11:56 AM writes...

You want fair use? I bought a very old epson projector from a company that was going out of business. This thing is older than the macrovision law. So yes, it has an AGC input, which chokes on macrovision (i.e. dvds). I use the GoDVD device to permit me to watch my dvds on my projector.

Permalink to Comment

3. Bob Killingsworth on June 16, 2005 04:57 PM writes...

ATI has long sold a line of digital video cards for computers that have analog TV capture capability. The hardware design is inherently immune to AGC copy protection, so ATI wrote Macrovision detection and compliance into the *software driver*! Needless to say, hacked ATI driver files that ignore the copy protection are widely available on the Net . . . and there's no one for Macrovision to sue.

Permalink to Comment


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 23
Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 22
Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 21
Kitchen Academy - The Hollywood Cookbook and Guest Chef Michael Montilla - March 18th
Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 20
Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 19
Kitchen Academy - Course II - Day 18
Salsa Verde