<rss version="0.91"><channel>
<title>Blogging the Political Conventions</title>
<link>http://www.corante.com/importance/archives/004483.html</link>
<description>WIRED is carrying an AP wirestory on the Democrats' decision to permit bloggers at their upcoming national convention (Blogs Welcome at Dems' Convention). Only a certain number of bloggers will be credentialed and the official selection process sounds like it...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>Convention Coverage is a Failed Regime and Bloggers Have Their Credentials</title>
<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2004/07/07/blog_boston.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[No one  knows what a political convention actually <i>is</i>, anymore, or why it takes 15,000 people to report on it.  Two successive regimes for making sense of the event have collapsed; a third has not emerged.  That's a good starting point for the w...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rosen and Hodder on Blogging, Political Conventiobns, and Journalism</title>
<link>http://www.corante.com/importance/archives/004823.html</link>
<description>I&apos;ve written a couple of pieces on bloggers at the political conventions (Blogging the Political Conventions and Major Broadcast Networks to Decrease Convention Coverage - Author Experiences Schadenfreude). I still stand by my conclusion that:Blogs at ...</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Major Broadcast Networks to Decrease Convention Coverage - Author Experiences Schadenfreude</title>
<link>http://www.corante.com/importance/archives/004726.html</link>
<description>Apparently, once again, the major broadcast networks will be scaling back political convention coverage, according to The Hill (TV to snub conventions). As I&apos;ve noted recently, I think the &quot;news&quot; coming out of the conventions should get a lot less...</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>